August 26, 2016 7:41 am Published by 3 Comments

Whenever I think of Pokémon GO and John Hanke, I always think of the word “fair.” Time and time again in recent months, whenever we hear from Hanke, he has a tendency to iterate how “Pokémon GO is a fair game.” But is it though?

I’ve been thinking about this question a lot lately and the more I think about it, the more I feel myself inclined to say no, it isn’t fair at all and somewhat contradictory if I’m honest. Since the app initially released and became a global phenomenon, we couldn’t get enough of it, but with every update that comes out, the game actually seems to be getting worse. Before we had a working tracking system that could actually be used to locate Pokémon, only to have tracking removed and now replaced with Sightings. Originally we were also able to find rare Pokémon nests and catch ourselves a ton of Dratinis, but then some of those nests vanished entirely, whereas others remained where they were, except Dratinis got replaced with Eevees, Zubats & Pidgeys and so on. Image result for Pokemon Go dratini nest

But today’s editorial isn’t about that, it’s about Pokémon GO’s fairness. Pokémon GO is supposed to be for everyone and offer a fair and fun experience, but it doesn’t because although people of all ages are able to play the game, not all of us have the means. For example, the older gamers who would love to partake in the game’s delights can’t enjoy the app as much as they would like because of work commitments and other responsibilities, whereas the younger generation have all the time in the world. So straight away the younger gen of gamers are at an unfair advantage, but although they can play more and catch more, they’re not as financially equipped as the older gamers. Whereas they can’t afford to fork out on , but the older gen, who have jobs and a steady income can. So while the younger gen are actually forced to go out and Poké Stops to go get more, the older gen just pull out their phones and spend a minute to make another purchase.

Image result for Pokemon Go purchases

Admittedly you could argue that the two things balance themselves out, because in a way it does, but it doesn’t make the game fair, especially when you consider something such as location. Not all of us live in cities and towns. In fact a lot of us playing the game live in rural areas, places where rare Pokémon don’t show up that often and when I say often, I do of course mean once every 3 to 5 days, which leaves us with nowt all else to do but catch more Ratatta and Pidgeys, whilst waiting a few hours before even a Poliwag decides to show up. Sure using lures does help make more Pokémon spawn and better ones too, but again it comes back to money, not everyone can afford to fork out a fortune on lures. Businesses can though.

In fact more reports are coming in which state businesses are not only putting out lures, but are actually in talks with Niantic and are paying to have rarer Pokémon spawn around their establishment. If that’s true, then it does make a mockery of the game’s “fairness.” A business being a paid sponsor is one thing, but to actually be able to pay for rarer Pokémon to show up, when rural areas get nothing but common Pokés is wrong. We don’t control where we live, but it literally sounds like Niantic is saying, “Rare Pokémon? We can help with that, but it will cost you.” It is essentially extortion. Sure you don’t have to go down that route, there is an alternative, you play the game “fairly” and take a lot of road trips to larger cities such as London, New York and Paris. Sure it might seem feasible at first, but when you find yourself going back over and over again, that’s where it gets expensive. But then again, Pokémon GO is an expensive game.

Given the amount of revenue the game has amassed in such a short amount of time, you would think Niantic might turn around and say “well, actually we could drop the prices on a few things,” but they haven’t. The prices remain the same and there has been no chatter whatsoever of lowering them, but then why would all those involved want the prices dropped? Everyone involved is making a lot of money, off an app which doesn’t properly represent a game series we have been in love with for decades. Gym Badges are gone, certain Pokémon no longer evolve when you trade them and all battling is done in real time. In fact because of the lack of the true Pokémon elements, you could argue Pokémon GO could very easily be Digimon GO, or even Yo-Kai Watch GO, and you would be right to do so.

As much as I actually love this game and love every minute spent playing it, Pokémon GO is a wolf in Sheep’s clothing and in this case, the sheep is Pokémon and no, it’s not Flaffy. Hanke keeps saying that it’s a fair game, but fair to whom? Those playing the game? The developers? Or those who stand to profit the most? And then of course there’s the cheating and bans. Due to various complaints of players spoofing their GPS locations to catch certain Pokémon in other areas, or exploiting the game to give themselves Articunos, Niantic are now coming down hard on these cheaters and that’s good. But not when a lot of the people they are banning don’t deserve to have their accounts deleted in the first place. Banning cheaters is one thing, but when a lot of people are being banned because they used third party apps to check the IVs of their Pokémon, well that’s not right.

Image result for Pokemon Go bans

 

Why? Because in Niantic’s latest update for the app, you can now have your Team Leader check over the Pokémon you catch, essentially evaluating their IVs. Had this update come out sooner, those banned players might not have felt compelled to check the IVs of their Pokémon, meaning they could have avoided being banned altogether and now Niantic seem to be banning people who haven’t actually done anything wrong, all because other players have reported them, so what’s fair about that Niantic?

Like I said before, I do love this game, and I really enjoyed every minute I spent playing it, but the game is losing a lot of players interest because of all the banning, the loss of tracking and the lack of content. I hate to say it, but right now it seems Niantic are actually more interested in releasing the app in more countries, so that they can milk their cash cow dry before the bring out new content as a means of getting us all back on board the Pokémon GO train and spending our saved up notes. And if that hasn’t made you want to punch me in the face, this probably will, right now Pokémon GO doesn’t feel like a Pokémon game. It feels like a money machine that Niantic are very fond of and despite their claims of it being fair, it isn’t. The game is biased. It is not fair, but I do enjoy it, so I’m not going to stop playing it, but I am going to stop buying in to the line Niantic seem intent to sell to us. Image result for Pokemon Go bans

To those of you still reading, thanks for sticking and reading to the end of this editorial. Should you wish to call me out on any of the above things I said, feel free to do so, that’s what comments are for. You listened to my opinion, so it’s only fair I listen to yours, so let me have it.

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Categorised in: , , , ,

This post was written by Solid Jack

3 Comments

  • Okay, seriously? Most of this is pretty much whiny nonsense. First of all, Pokemon Go is a freemium game, which means they aren’t making any money unless people pay them for features, which means that of course they are going to try and make money. Nothing you said about Pokemon Go in that regard can’t be said about literally every single other f2p game out there. Now, if you think freemium games are the spawn of Satan, feel free to not play them but you can’t really complain that they are trying to make some money here.

    In all honesty I think it is reasonably fair as long as you live in/near even a moderately sized city as even smaller cities have quite a few Pokestops in their downtown areas. Yes, it sucks for the few people that play in very rural locations, and that can probably be addressed with their planned request system for PokeStops. And the amount that you can pay to just be better than everyone else is very limited. You cannot buy stardust or candies to power your Pokemon up, you still have to go out there and catch them like everyone else. So it is really fair for a f2p game.And I have zero problems with somebody paying to have rare Pokemon spawn around their business. If Pokemon Go can help their business, well, good for them, everybody wins. The business wins because they can get more customers, Niantic wins because they make money, and players win because they can catch rare Pokemon. Seriously, are you a communist or something? Is the idea that people want to make money abhorrent to you?

    Also, yes, sucks to be you if you don’t have all the free time in the world. Guess what? That is also true about every multiplayer game in existence. The people with more time on their hands are going to do better than those who don’t. Again, not worth singling out Pokemon Go for something that is true of most games. And if you’re a kid who doesn’t have money to play games, well, that also sucks but that’s true of every other game out there as well.

    As far as the bans go, it does clearly state ‘no using third party tools’ in the terms of service so no, it’s your own fault if you get banned for using an IV checker that logs into your account. There are plenty of them that don’t require access to your account that you can put the info for your Pokemon in manually and those don’t cause you to be banned. Use a GPS spoofer or have multiple accounts? Also your own damn fault. The only people who have any right to complain are those who got banned by mistake, and yes that is the only legitimate complaint you have here.

    Lastly, it’s a BETA. Not a finished game. Of course it doesn’t have that many features YET. But they are adding more and more every so often. Even features that they weren’t originally planning but got added in due to player demand for such a feature, such as IV checking. It’s like the gift that keeps on giving. Bored of it? Stop playing. They add something new that you like? Feel free to start up again. I take it you haven’t played very many independent games on Steam or anything like that.

  • I do agree that Pokemon GO is a game designed for everyone and is designed to offer a fun experience. However, fairness is tough to judge for anything, especially GO. I do agree it’s biased towards some people, like people who live in bigger cities or have more opportunities to travel or spend. Where you live and where you go already determines what Pokemon you see, which already could be considered unfair. That can be the fun of it though, since when you go out to other places, you may find new and different Pokemon which can be exciting. However, I don’t know that I’d call it unfair as they offer everyone the same chance to get Pokemon. You just have to be in the right place, which is more of a bias.

    As for the whole paying situation, that’s how pay to play is. People who can and are willing to pay get more. If you had to pay just to get a certain Pokemon, that would verge on unfair. Luckily, Niantic has a system where you’re paying for more chances, opportunities, and bonuses. Even if you don’t pay, which I have never done for GO yet, you can do a lot and catch a lot.

    Regarding cheating, that’s also a result of people thinking that they’re entitled to the very best. I don’t really care too much if people cheat, even in this game where you get big payoffs for having good Pokemon, but if you directly affect a game by spoofing or whatnot using another program, then Niantic has the right to ban. It doesn’t matter if you wanted great IVs or not nor does it matter that there’s an appraisal system now; actions have consequences.

    Overhauling the game and making it one where everyone sees the exact same Pokemon all the time might take away the allure. The real Pokemon games are better for that, though even they might not be considered fair. There are numerous timed events that only people who can download it from wifi or get to a certain store can access. Likewise, you need to trade to catch ’em all, which not everyone actually does or can do. Even the whole IV/EV thing is not technically fair since it’s not something that has really been advertised before (though the new games are making it more overt). People can and do either look up these hidden values or hack in their own Pokemon, some of which do get through to Pokemon World Championships.

    All this said, the whole point of the game is to have fun. It’s fine to take it seriously, but people who get upset at the game or at others who have more to spend on it should just remember it’s a game. Not everyone will think it’s fun, and there are elements Niantic could do better in. But overall, I’d say that it has been a pleasant experience. Whether fair or not, I’m having a great time still! Excellent article though! You do bring great points, and I certainly don’t mean to just try to bring this up for no reason or blindly defend NIantic or GO. I just believe that there is more to the game than just haves and have-nots.

  • Fair?? It’s been two months since the game came out and niactic has no concerns of releasing the game in South Asia cause the numbers of users will be high here with less real revenue (cause most people don’t have cards here, everyone is gonna be free to play).
    I’m from Nepal and even if I have the app throgh apk file and creating a US Apple account, the map in pokemon go is empty, geo-blocked….

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.